Home > English > Judicial Cases > Full Text

Guiding Case No. 90: Bei Huifeng v. Traffic Police Brigade of the Public Security Bureau of Haining City (Case about dispute over an administrative penalty of road traffic management)

指导案例90号:贝汇丰诉海宁市公安局交通警察大队道路交通管理行政处罚案

【CLI Code】 CLI.C.10200690(EN)  Statement

  • Guiding Case No. 90: Bei Huifeng v. Traffic Police Brigade of the Public Security Bureau of Haining City (Case about dispute over an administrative penalty of road traffic management)
  • 指导案例90号:贝汇丰诉海宁市公安局交通警察大队道路交通管理行政处罚案
  • (Issued on November 15, 2017 as deliberated and adopted by the Judicial Committee of the Supreme People's Court)
  • (最高人民法院审判委员会讨论通过 2017年11月15日发布)
  • Guiding Case No. 90
  • 指导案例90号
  • Keywords
  • 关键词
  • administrative; administrative penalty; giving way by motor vehicles; passing a pedestrian crosswalk
  • 行政/行政处罚/机动车让行/正在通过人行横道
  • Key Points of Judgment
  • 裁判要点】  
  • Politely letting pedestrians cross the roads first is a basic requirement for civilized and safe driving. When the driver passes a pedestrian crosswalk by driving a vehicle and there is a pedestrian who was passing the crosswalk or stopping on the crosswalk, the driver of the vehicle should voluntarily stop the vehicle and give way to the pedestrian, unless the pedestrian gives a clear sign to let the vehicle pass first. Where the traffic management department of the public security organ imposes an administrative penalty on the motor vehicle driver who does not politely let pedestrians cross the road first, the people's court should uphold such administrative penalty.
  • 礼让行人是文明安全驾驶的基本要求。机动车驾驶人驾驶车辆行经人行横道,遇行人正在人行横道通行或者停留时,应当主动停车让行,除非行人明确示意机动车先通过。公安机关交通管理部门对不礼让行人的机动车驾驶人依法作出行政处罚的,人民法院应予支持。
  • Legal Provisions
  • 相关法条
  • Basic Facts
  • 基本案情
  • Plaintiff Bei Huifeng alleged that: When the motor vehicle (Zhe F1158J) he drove (hereinafter referred to as the “vehicle involved”) approached the pedestrian crosswalk, a pedestrian has stopped on the crosswalk. Therefore, the pedestrian was not “passing the crosswalk.” In addition, Xishan Road where the vehicle involved passed was a trunk road in Haining City and at the time, there was heavy traffic in the road section and there were no traffic lights in the intersection. If as long as there was a pedestrian on the crosswalk, the motor vehicle would stop and gave way, it would greatly affect the traffic efficiency. As a result, he was allowed to not stop the vehicle involved when safe passage could be guaranteed, he could directly pass the crosswalk by driving the vehicle involved, and he should not be punished. The written decision on penalty according to the summary procedure of public security traffic management (No. 3304811102542425) issued by the Traffic Police Brigade of the Public Security Bureau of Haining City (hereinafter referred to as the “Traffic Police Brigade of Haining City”) was illegal. Therefore, Bei Huifeng requested the Court to set aside the written decision on administrative penalty is
  • 原告贝汇丰诉称:其驾驶浙F1158J汽车(以下简称“案涉车辆”)靠近人行横道时,行人已经停在了人行横道上,故不属于“正在通过人行横道”。而且,案涉车辆经过的西山路系海宁市主干道路,案发路段车流很大,路口也没有红绿灯,如果只要人行横道上有人,机动车就停车让行,会在很大程度上影响通行效率。所以,其可以在确保通行安全的情况下不停
  • ......
  • ......
  • Tel: +86 (10) 8268-9699 or +86 (10) 8266-8266 (ext. 153)
  • Mobile: +86 133-1157-0712
  • Fax: +86 (10) 8266-8268
  • database@chinalawinfo.com
© Pkulaw (www.pkulaw.com) provides various professional solutions in such fields as legal information, law knowledge and legal software. Pkulaw provides you with abundant reference materials. When you invoke articles of laws and regulations, please check them with the standard texts.
You are welcome to view all our products and services.Pkulaw Express:How to quickly find information you need? What are the new features of Pkulaw V6?
智能检索